top 53 integrated writing
The reading discussed over this point that increasing cigarette taxes brings about several advantages three of which explained in the article, yet the lecture pin points that each of this benefits face challenges which explains as follow.
First, according to the passage high taxes over cigarette discourage smoker to but cigarette and instead persuade them to give up their unhealthy habitats and this approach can be applied for unhealthy food. However, this is in contrast with what the professor believes. She explains that with increasing cigarette taxes, smoker prefer to buy cheaper cigarettes with lower quality which have even more tobacco and cause even more health problems for smokers similarly it happens for unhealthy food since people would not ignore their unhealthy diet and as a result they have less money to buy healthy food.
Second the article supports this point that high taxes for cigarette is financially fair for smoker since this taxes can be used for medical costs and smokers definitely are the main subscribers of these medical services in comparison to the normal members of the society. Nevertheless, the professor casts doubt on this point since she believes this taxes would be unfair for even smokers. She mentions that smokers are two types from low salary and from high salary and these taxes do not make any difference for the second group while, it makes a huge difference for low salary smokers.
Third, the passage claims that taxes over cigarette can be a great revenue for government for benefit of public welfare and constructing parks and stadiums. this is, however, in opposite of what the lecturer believes. She points out that this policy prevents the governments to put signs and alarms for unhealthy consequences of smoking cigarette and brings about even more harmful results because governments do not want to lose its budgets that come from these taxes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-06 | nazlinazli | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...benefits face challenges which explains as follow. First, according to the passage high ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...te is financially fair for smoker since this taxes can be used for medical costs and...
^^^^
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...re and constructing parks and stadiums. this is, however, in opposite of what the le...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, similarly, so, third, while, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15434083601 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46574949992 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527331189711 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.9618520042 49.2860985944 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.3 110.228320801 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1 21.698381199 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.3589403974 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.