The reading and the lecture are both about the solution of ways that preserve the Torreya taxifolia. While the author of the article argues three ways that can possibly protect them, the lecture disputes the claims presented in the article.
According to the reading, it states that replants in the same area have already thrived for a long time. The article mentions that Northern Florida is very suitable to Torreya grow which is cool and damp. This argument is challenged by the lecture. He claims that the Florida weather is very changeable which is caused by global warming. Additionally he points out that it has become dryer than before, so it is hard to grow well.
Secondly, the author suggests moving them to another location. The article notes that if the Torreya moved to a northern place, it would be better for them to be very cooler and not dry. The lecture however suggests that it is dangerous to other plants and trees. He goes on to say that it can killed other plants and destroyed the other environment.
Finally, the author puts forth the idea that research centers preserve Torreya. The author contends that the center can take care of these trees very specifically. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is they have no capacity to administer these. He says that before the tree population team in the wild also had a hard time to manage and protect it.
- Adapted from Dana Gioia Why Literature Matters 2005 by The New York Times Company Originally published April 10 2005 A strange thing has happened in the American arts during the past quarter century While income rose to unforeseen levels college attendanc 65
- which one do you prefer? high-school students should take different subjects at the same time or they should focus on three or four subjects at the time. 60
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well 80
- TPO53 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- The most important value to share with a young child (5-10 years old)—Helping others —Honesty —Being well organised 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lution of ways that preserve the Torreya taxifolia. While the author of the artic...
^^
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...r of the article argues three ways that can possibly protect them, the lecture disputes the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 339, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...able which is caused by global warming. Additionally he points out that it has become dryer ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'kill'
Suggestion: kill
...nd trees. He goes on to say that it can killed other plants and destroyed the other en...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...ees very specifically. In contrast, the lecturers stance is they have no capacity to admi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76987447699 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.387549036 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564853556485 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.4465785564 49.2860985944 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.0 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9333333333 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184351903884 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505115352664 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625742136745 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101843556528 0.162205337803 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682926913688 0.0443174109184 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.