TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem

The reading lists three points that doubts the painting of Rembrandt. On the other hand, the lecture contradicts all three points presented in the reading.

First, the reading mentions that there are inconsistent about the woman in the potrait is dressed. The woman wear a cheap hat while she wear expensive dress. However, the professors refutes this argument by saying that the potrait is repainted by someone to raise its price after hundred years.

Second, according to the reading, Rembrandt made an error error when the painting should have shadow instead reflection because dark fur would rather absorb the light than reflect it. Nevertheless, the lecturer opposes this and give explanation that the woman was wearing light and cloth originally so why the shadow was not appeared.

Third, the professor disputes argument in the reading that says Rembradnt never uses a panel glue together. She argues that Rembrandnt doing so to expand the size of painting to make it more valuable. Also, she cites some researchs that the wood is came from the same tree.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wears'.
Suggestion: wears
...d. The woman wear a cheap hat while she wear expensive dress. However, the professor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ted by someone to raise its price after hundred years. Second, according to the read...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: error
...rding to the reading, Rembrandt made an error error when the painting should have shadow in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...e cites some researchs that the wood is came from the same tree.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, nevertheless, second, so, third, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 1373.03311258 65% => OK
No of words: 175.0 270.72406181 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12571428571 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44648852898 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.674285714286 0.540411800872 125% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 419.366225166 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7968252635 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333316159247 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107986348799 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098681551885 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170514592195 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969604743185 0.0443174109184 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.