The reading and lecturer are both talking about classifying the dinosaurs under the endothermic animals or not; which, got an agreement of the reading and disagreement the lecture that both opinion has been supported by the argument of each one of them.
The reading consider that the dinosaurs are endothermic; that explained through two reasons: the fossils of the dinosaurs that found in the polar areas; where, in such a weather conditions, the active animals could adapt with the low temperature.
Moreover, the underneath leg position of the dinosaurs; which, enable it from running in order to keep them warmer. Another reason, is the bone structure which called the Haversian canals. The Haversian canals is responsible about the rapidly growth of the animals; which, is one of the indicators about the endothermic.
The lecturer has totally refutes the fact the the dinosaurs were endothermic and he gave the following reasons as a contradiction with the reading: The fossils is not a reason for being dinosaurs endothermic since they are look like the other animals affect by warm and can migrate to the places that would have such a weather. Furthermore, being the dinosaurs has their legs under their bodies doesn't mean they are high energy and endothermic; but, its only for running. The body structure of the dinosaurs supports their weight; while, the legs under their body give advantage for having a large size. The advantage of the large body doesn't need for the dinosaurs to be endothermic & running in order to support the idea of putting their legs under-their bodies. The Haversian canals that named as the bone growth rings: is the thickning of the bone that indicate the periods of time for the growth of the dinosaurs; which, would be rapidly then slow and vise versa. The rapid and slowing pattern of the growth is not an evidence about being the dinosaurs an endothermic animals: which should be having a constant body temperature and growing rapidly even if the temperature is cold.
Finally, the passage and the lecturer both refutes each other; where, each one of them has its own arguments that we should in the previous comparison.
- Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher. Others think that it is always better to have a teacher. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons to develop your essay. 73
- TPO-08 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 66
- TPO-08 - Integrated Writing Task Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including ki 47
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'considers'.
Suggestion: considers
...nt of each one of them. The reading consider that the dinosaurs are endothermic; tha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 43, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...e lecturer has totally refutes the fact the the dinosaurs were endothermic and he gave ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 43, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...e lecturer has totally refutes the fact the the dinosaurs were endothermic and he gave ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 252, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ce they are look like the other animals affect by warm and can migrate to the places that...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 396, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...saurs has their legs under their bodies doesnt mean they are high energy and endotherm...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 637, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e size. The advantage of the large body doesnt need for the dinosaurs to be endothermi...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 766, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... putting their legs under-their bodies. The Haversian canals that named as the bone...
^^^
Line 6, column 970, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ld be rapidly then slow and vise versa. The rapid and slowing pattern of the growth...
^^^
Line 6, column 1074, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'animal'?
Suggestion: animal
...bout being the dinosaurs an endothermic animals: which should be having a constant body...
^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the previous comparison.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, then, while, as to, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1373.03311258 133% => OK
No of words: 360.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06944444444 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64622256096 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 553.5 419.366225166 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.561407998 49.2860985944 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.083333333 110.228320801 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 21.698381199 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409304407528 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150688718109 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693966689366 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174072194034 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128881374614 0.0443174109184 291% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.3589403974 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.