Talking about impact on pursuing ecological certification for the woods company, paragraph states that pursuing ecological certification will provide negative effect on the sales of the product. Whereas lecture suggests that it will give good market for the woods company.
Paragraph states that advertising of ecological product will not support because Americans are exposed too much with advertising and they do not have trust in advertising. Contrary to this opinion, lecturer says that despite of being exposed in the advertising, Americans do rely on the advertisement if it is coming from independent organisation and they have trust worthiness and interest on these advertisements if it is showing proper value.
Paragraph states that American are too much cautious in pricing and price of the certified product will be more due to additional cost of pursuing certification. In spite of buying certified wood, american will go for cheap price wood. Casting doubt on this reason, lecture states that everyone worries about the price. It is obvious to reject higher prices, basically depends on the difference in certified and non-certified. If the difference in pricing is less than 5% than American will go for certified wood to keep the value of preservation and ecological certifications.
Regarding foreign market, paragraph states that American companies use to sell their product in the United state only. There is no need to get certified to sell abroad. Whereas lecture states that American companies does not bother about selling their product in foreign market but they worry about competition of foreign companies which suggest that foreign company can come and sell ecological certified product in the american market.
- TPO-18 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 60
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-30 - Integrated Writing Task A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a "burning mirror": a polished co 83
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'woods'' or 'wood's'?
Suggestion: woods'; wood's
...rsuing ecological certification for the woods company, paragraph states that pursuing...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'woods'' or 'wood's'?
Suggestion: woods'; wood's
...s that it will give good market for the woods company. Paragraph states that adverti...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 68, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...aragraph states that American companies use to sell their product in the United sta...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'whereas', 'talking about', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.255172413793 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.179310344828 0.158904122519 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.120689655172 0.0723426182421 167% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0344827586207 0.0435111971325 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0310344827586 0.0277247811725 112% => OK
Prepositions: 0.168965517241 0.128828473217 131% => OK
Participles: 0.0551724137931 0.0370669169778 149% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.9148524634 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0241379310345 0.0208969081088 116% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0586206896552 0.128158765124 46% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0241379310345 0.0158828679856 152% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00344827586207 0.0114777025283 30% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1738.0 1645.83664459 106% => OK
No of words: 270.0 271.125827815 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.43703703704 6.08160592843 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.42962962963 0.374372842146 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.359259259259 0.287516216867 125% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.225925925926 0.187439937562 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.151851851852 0.113142543107 134% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9148524634 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507407407407 0.539623497131 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.943429655 53.8517498576 91% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5 21.7502111507 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.8370587256 49.3711431718 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.833333333 132.220823453 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.7502111507 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.583333333333 0.878197800319 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 58.4259259259 50.5018328374 116% => OK
Elegance: 1.95774647887 1.90840788429 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.536617765165 0.549887131256 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.133485693968 0.142949733639 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0777328341511 0.0787303798458 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.622452003766 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.176343610502 0.139662658121 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.237918716135 0.266732575781 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716184871082 0.103435571967 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.260434610031 0.414875509568 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0540607715156 0.0530846634433 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336957191456 0.40443939384 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770872108841 0.0528353158467 146% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.