Tpo 1
The reading passage mentions to new system of working which offers to employees four days work instead of five days working in the United States and supports the concept base on three reasons. However, the professor cast doubts about mentioned theory in the passage and explains other aspects of the reading points to clarify his disagreement.
In the first place, the professor repudiates the first point of the reading which refers to achieve more profit for companies by working four days in a week due to employees more time to rest, less defects and employees will attain 80 percent of the pay by working four days. In the professor’s opinion this idea will be more costly instead of being profitable because, more workers mean spending more money due to needs to more space, tools and devices. Therefore, accepting this notion due to be profitable seems inconvenience.
As a second reason, the reading’s point about high rate of employment cannot be logical because the professor uncovers that options like working four days work cannot be responsible to create more career. In addition, choices like that can increase the expectations. In the other words the employers expect five days tasks in four days from employees. As a result, adding less days work option doesn’t enhance the working rate.
Thirdly, the access to more time is mention as another benefit of less working days but the lecturer challenges the mentioned point. Because, he express that financial side of life has more effect in the life’s quality. In fact it cannot be reasonable to give 80 percent of salary instead of spending more time with family. Besides that, it hinders to advance the job skills and managers will be prefer five days work due to managing subjects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun defects is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...eek due to employees more time to rest, less defects and employees will attain 80 pe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun days is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ys from employees. As a result, adding less days work option doesn't enhance t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, thirdly, in addition, in fact, as a result, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 293.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06825938567 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63979881458 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535836177474 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.332443609 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.230769231 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.