Both the reading and the listening offer opposing views on the authentication of the painting that is whether the girl in potrait is Jane Austin or not. While the passage mentions that the girl in potrait is Jane Austin, the lecturer repudiates it by providing some facts.
First, the article posits that the Austen's family gave the permission to endorse that it is Jane's potrait. The professor refutes this by saying that the potrait authorized by the extended family 70 years after the death of Austen. The family has not seen her alive and thus, cannot authenticate the potrait.
Second, the passage claims that the girl in potrait resembles to the sketch made by Jane's sister Cassandra. The speaker contends this by saying that Jane's family is very large. There are many children in the family. The potrait may belong to any children and there are some evidence that potrait belongs to one of the distant cousin of the Jane.
Third, the reading mentions that the painting is made by the professional Ozias Humphrey. Moreover, he was active in the late 1780's and early 1790's, the exact time when Jane was of the age as girl painted in the potrait. On the other hand, the professor says that the canvas of the painting has some stamp on the back which belongs to the person's shop . The person's shop was opened when Jane was around 27 years old. Therefore, Jane was older than the girl in the potrait.
Clearly, the disparity exists between the passage and the lecturer, but, the speaker provides more legitimate and tangible factors. Thus, the reading fails to justify its point towards him.
- The best test of an argument is the argument's ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. 60
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 50
- TOEFL integrated writing: Altruism 3
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e back which belongs to the persons shop . The persons shop was opened when Jane w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, third, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8152173913 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31872397262 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507246376812 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7692074974 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0625 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264033345235 0.272083759551 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934064003009 0.0996497079465 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738417220754 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131692980102 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0853358824225 0.0443174109184 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.