tpo 13
The reading claims that selling fossils to private ownerships is a great misery and provides three reasons of support. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents several points to refute them all.
First, the author argues that this is causing huge public suffer because people could not see these fossils after rich persons buy them. In the contrast, the lecturer casts doubt on this idea by stating that lots of low level places such as public libraries could also by these fossils and allowed people to see them, so, people have more chance to get familiar with these valuable fossils.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that scientists are not able to investigate the fossils which are sold to the private ownerships. Conversely, the professor underlines the fact that before these fossils are sold to the rich people, they should pass through the hand of scientists. She states that scientists examine these fossils and put value on them before they sale the fossils, and as a result, they can thoroughly investigate them.
Finally, the reading asserts that commercial fossils ownerships damage these fossils and this is a huge lost. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that although these people sometimes destroy this valuable fossils, they provide an opportunity for scientists to excavate more cites and find more fossils. She also believes that it is more beneficial for scientists to discover more fossils and such a small lost should not been considered as a huge disadvantage.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'so', 'such as', 'as a result', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.23381294964 0.261695866417 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.154676258993 0.158904122519 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.10071942446 0.0723426182421 139% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0431654676259 0.0435111971325 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0431654676259 0.0277247811725 156% => OK
Prepositions: 0.107913669065 0.128828473217 84% => OK
Participles: 0.0287769784173 0.0370669169778 78% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.49019299058 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0359712230216 0.0208969081088 172% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.136690647482 0.128158765124 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0179856115108 0.0158828679856 113% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00359712230216 0.0114777025283 31% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1555.0 1645.83664459 94% => OK
No of words: 255.0 271.125827815 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.09803921569 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.380392156863 0.374372842146 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.294117647059 0.287516216867 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.16862745098 0.187439937562 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0980392156863 0.113142543107 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49019299058 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545098039216 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 53.3260303329 53.8517498576 99% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 25.5 21.7502111507 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3142526659 49.3711431718 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.5 132.220823453 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 21.7502111507 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 54.9117647059 50.5018328374 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.53731343284 1.90840788429 81% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.626815284011 0.549887131256 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.173458971161 0.142949733639 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0910347043167 0.0787303798458 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.696238069519 0.631733273073 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0839555903343 0.139662658121 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.325475746162 0.266732575781 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983817008841 0.103435571967 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.335633373553 0.414875509568 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0861371680948 0.0530846634433 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.444512421352 0.40443939384 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763140425021 0.0528353158467 144% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.