TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice

Salvage logging is the the practice of removing dead trees from areas that affected forest fires. The reading passage thinks that there are several reasons that salvage logging is beneficial for damaged forest and economy. But the lecturer thinks that salvage logging has long-term enviromental damage.
The reading passage thinks that by salvage logging, there would be additional spaces for growth of plants by reaching sunrise. But the lecturer thinks that this action doesn't necessarily increase the growth of other plants and will cause problems for natural decomposition of dead trees and natural soil nutritious.
The reading passage thinks that salvage logging will minimize dangers of insect infestation. Because dead trees are highly suitable habitat for insects such as spruce bark beetles which can be harmfull for forest. But the lecturer thinks that this problem is not bad for forest and also dead trees are very important for birds which is essential for forest trees.
Finally, the reading passage thinks that salvage logging will provide much wood that creates additional job and prospers the economy. But the lecturer thinks that these are small and temporary. Hence the salvage logging isnot confidential solution.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
Salvage logging is the the practice of removing dead trees from ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
Salvage logging is the the practice of removing dead trees from ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing has long-term enviromental damage. The reading passage thinks that by salva...
^^
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ut the lecturer thinks that this action doesnt necessarily increase the growth of othe...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ead trees and natural soil nutritious. The reading passage thinks that salvage ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s which is essential for forest trees. Finally, the reading passage thinks that...
^^
Line 4, column 196, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...nks that these are small and temporary. Hence the salvage logging isnot confidential ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, hence, so, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 30.3222958057 26% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 192.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44791666667 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35702260396 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 145.348785872 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505208333333 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9784627962 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0909090909 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4545454545 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445867769306 0.272083759551 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197071314148 0.0996497079465 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112735750588 0.0662205650399 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292721398607 0.162205337803 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119549063154 0.0443174109184 270% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.