tpo 14 salvage logging
both article and lecture are about salvage logging which is removing dead trees after a severe firing in forests, especially in the northwestern United states. The author of the reading believes that eliminating dead trees through the forest will benefit both forest and economy and supplies three reasons to endorse the theory. The lecturer challenges this statement and refutes each reason declared in the passage, as elaborated upon hereunder.
What tops the chart, the author proposes that the unanimated trees will occupy the forest and it takes a long time to decompose, and as a result, new trees cannot grow in the region. this claim is disputed by the lecturer. she states that cleaning up the forest is not necessary, it destroys the natural process of the jungle. Furthermore, the dead trees will be decomposed which enrich the soil with plenty nutrients which are requirement for growth of jungle's vegetation.
Equally important, the writer contends that the dead trees provide thriving conditions for insects which enormously destroy the other live trees. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that the idea is totally controversial, insects not only are not harmful for these habitats, but also they have lived there for a long time which they have passed their natural live. Additionally, the dead trees can provide home for many inhabitants in the jungle like birds and other kinds of animals.
Last but not least, it is stated in the article that the salvage logging benefits economy largely. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that the advantage of this process is small which cannot be considered a long economic situation. she brings forth the idea that the logs through harsh condition of the jungle cannot easily be exploited and they are only usable when some expensive and advanced vehicles like helicopter implemented to gather them. As well, the jobs which provide through this procedure are not long-lasting, so salvage logging cannot be lucrative for the economy and people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | nagy | 75 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Saeedghaderi | 85 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | birkiy | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | Mostafa93106325 | 93 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | Christine hanna | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
both article and lecture are about salvage l...
^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...t, new trees cannot grow in the region. this claim is disputed by the lecturer. she ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...this claim is disputed by the lecturer. she states that cleaning up the forest is n...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
... for growth of jungles vegetation. Equally important, the writer contends that the...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 238, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...e considered a long economic situation. she brings forth the idea that the logs thr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, so, well, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 328.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21646341463 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5532530923 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539634146341 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 419.366225166 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9779040549 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.214285714 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373206267108 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12277879152 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727397586408 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221908105437 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487287212821 0.0443174109184 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.