tpo 18 the Torreya tree declining
The material discusses the problem of the Torreya tree declining. While the reading suggests three ways to save Torreya from extinction, the listening challenges this and mentions that none of these ways is a satisfying solution.
First, the author states that Torreys could reestablish in the same location that they grew thousands of years. On the other hand, The professor opposes this and points out that reestablishing Torreya is not a successful solution. The lecturer explains that there is a change in the climate in the large region due to global warming. the professor adds that the wetland became drained. Furthermore, the speaker says that Northen Florida has become dryer than it was in the past, so Torreya could not survive in this climate.
Second, the listening states that Torreya could be moved to another location where the temperature is favorable. In contrast, the lecturer refutes this and posits that this approach could have some challenges. The speaker states that when the Balckluke trees move to another location, they spread very quickly and killed the plants and trees in this area. Moreover, the professor adds that these plants and trees were endangered. As a result, the lecturer says that changing the location of trees has unpredicted outcomes.
Third, the reading suggests preserving Torreya's seeds in research centers. Conversely, the listening contradicts this and states that it is not a proper solution since seeds could not resist diseases. The professor mentions that seeds should be in large numbers and genetically modified. The lecturer says that research centers do not have enough capacity for these seeds, so they will not capable to survive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...the large region due to global warming. the professor adds that the wetland became ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, then, third, while, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26199261993 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60698430219 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516605166052 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 16.0 8.23620309051 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6647939484 49.2860985944 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.125 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300656986837 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972760695094 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777173361011 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18627587536 0.162205337803 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00331995506801 0.0443174109184 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.