TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people

Essay topics:

TPO-19 - Integrated Writing Task Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people,buzzers,who personally promote (buzz) products to people

The reading and the lecture are both about advertising agencies hiring buzzers to talk good about their product. The author of the reading believes that buzzers are not being truthful about the reviews of the products, and it creates controversy. However, the lecturer casts doubts about the claims made in the article and refutes all of the theories presented in the reading passage.

First of all, the author points out that consumers must be aware if the person praising a certain product is buzzing. The author mentions that buzzers are being paid to mislead or and give false information to products in order to sell it. The point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that buzzers actually telling the truth about the products they are endorsing. Furthermore, He argues that companies hire them for their honesty on the products, and they just don't tell that the products is good, rather, they believe that the ones they are endorsing is effective and good.

Secondly, the author contends that consumers are mislead that buzzers are just an ordinary individual. The article notes that consumers are being pushed to choose products based on what the buzzers are telling them. However, the lecturer rebuts this argument. He suggests that people are asking for their questions with regards to price, service, length they used the products. He elaborates on this by mentioning that if the consumers doesn't believe that the products is not worth buying for, they have their own decision whether to but the product or not.

Finally, the author states that buzzing has negative effect on social relationship. The article establishes that when people are aware that the person they have talk to are buzzers, they become less trustful to people. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that buzzers only endorse products that are worth while to buy, which is durable, efficient, cost efficient. Moreover, He puts forth the idea that when consumers tried the buzzed products they are trustful and more open to people, due to, the products they bought are good products.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-01 supergirl20 76 view
2019-12-13 shrijan 80 view
2019-11-30 haoboooo 68 view
2019-11-14 bishoy 81 view
2019-10-23 maryam_torabi 71 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user toeflbeginner :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... claims made in the article and refutes all of the theories presented in the reading passa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... honesty on the products, and they just dont tell that the products is good, rather,...
^^^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'misled'.
Suggestion: misled
... the author contends that consumers are mislead that buzzers are just an ordinary indiv...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...his by mentioning that if the consumers doesnt believe that the products is not worth ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: WORTH_WHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worthwhile'?
Suggestion: worthwhile
... buzzers only endorse products that are worth while to buy, which is durable, efficient, co...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 10.4613686534 239% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 22.412803532 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 343.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05247813411 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40013061096 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507288629738 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8060727186 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.941176471 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406168012439 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12893052032 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768821023758 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253706538184 0.162205337803 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085755957003 0.0443174109184 194% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.