TPO 2

The article states that having a team of people attacking a project offers several advantages and it provides 3 reasons to support that, however, the professor explains that there was an experience of a company that shows quite the opposite and, refuses each of the author's reasons.
first, the reading claims that having more people working to the same end on a project means having more expertise, knowledge, and skills which consequence to have the result more quickly while the professor refutes this point by saying that sometimes it took so many meeting and so long for the group members to reach consensus and this caused the project to move slower.
second, the article posits that working on a team will result in having more creative solutions on the project, because if they fail no individual is responsible, while the professor says that there were occasions that some of the team members who had more influence made a highly creative idea to be dropped or in the other hand compelled the team to choose a failure idea while the others who tried to tell them that they will fail were ignored.
third, the passage claims that any individual has the chance to shine in teamwork, but the professor opposes this point by explaining that in some cases they were members who did not contribute and when the project ended well the hole team gets the well-done part, no names were included.