TPO 20
In this set of materials the reading passage discusses that some people are disagree with the policy that called "let it burn" when a fire started in the Yellowstone forest. And they provide some reason for their concern. While,in the listening the professor casts doubt on what is persented in the text and believes that the fires is a natural ecological cycle of forest and it is not harmful but has some benefits for forest.
First of all, in the text it is clearly mentioned that fires damge to vegetation and trees. However, the professor claims that fire destruction some vegetation and let to other kind of plants to colonies the forests. Because fires provide opportunity for some plants species that before fire cannot grow in the forest. For example, seed of some plants can germinate just after heating.
In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that fires damage to the animal wildlife of forest. She says that fires provide good chance for some certain small plants to grows and it provide good food resource for small animals like robites.
Finally, in the text it is stated that the fires can be harmful for local business because of decrease in the number of visitors that come to the forest. The professor subscribes that the fires in the yellowstone forest depended on the amount of rain falls and fire not happen every years. For example, the yellowstone forest has not seasonal fire for about several years and the tourist come back to visit there each year after then.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-25 | Apolytos | 70 | view |
| 2022-01-18 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-12-28 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
- TPO 30 80
- Do you agree or not?Because people are busy doing so many things, they do very few things well. 76
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 81
- TPO 45: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. Use specific reasons and ex 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
... passage discusses that some people are disagree with the policy that called 'let i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...ide some reason for their concern. While,in the listening the professor casts doubt...
^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'plants'' or 'plant's'?
Suggestion: plants'; plant's
...ause fires provide opportunity for some plants species that before fire cannot grow in...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...me certain small plants to grows and it provide good food resource for small animals li...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...source for small animals like robites. Finally, in the text it is stated that t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, then, while, for example, in addition, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8992248062 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35740499953 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503875968992 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9229122694 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316981305526 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134667449484 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506039932407 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210273862448 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269464901608 0.0443174109184 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.