The article states that many people called for replacing "let it policy" that caused damage to yellowstone forests, and provides three reasons of support. However, the profssor states that Yellowstone fires are part of ecological circles and these fires are not destructive, but creative process. And she refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that Yellowstone fires caused tremendous damage to the park's trees and other vegetation. The professor disagree with point by saying that the scorched land has adopted new plant species which become so diverse. She explains that increasing in species diversity brought opportunites to other species, for example, small plants that need an open, shade land to grow. Also, plants have developed seeds that resistant to highly heat expsoure.
Second, the article posits that the park wildlife was affedted as well, such as deer and elk wrere seen fleeing the fire, in addition to others were unable to escape. The professor, on the other hand, emphasizes that the fire had created an oppotrunity to new animals species to inhabit the scorched land, as well as, the new plant species. For instance, small plants are ideal for rabbits and heers to feed on, Consequently, predators that feed on rabbits also have good oppotunity the grow up in this land. And ultimately, the professor says, certain new food chains have strongly survive chance.
Third, the reading avers that the fires compromised the value of the park as a touist attraction. Conversely, the professor opposes this point by stating that this could be true, if fires would have happened every year. But, since the 1988, there was no fire incident had happened in yellowstone park. So, this point is totally unfair and vistors contimue to visit the park after this incident at normal level.
- The popular 5-day workweek has long been a staple in U.S. business. With employees working 8 hours a day for a total of 40 hours a week, it has been seen as a model of efficiency. However, some companies and government agencies have begun converting to a 83
- TOEFL T P O 29 Integrated Writing Task 63
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 80
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 68
- TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which informa 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... professor disagree with point by saying that the scorched land has adopted new p...
^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
... fire had created an oppotrunity to new animals species to inhabit the scorched land, a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ed on rabbits also have good oppotunity the grow up in this land. And ultimately, the pr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'survived'.
Suggestion: survived
..., certain new food chains have strongly survive chance. Third, the reading avers tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had happened'?
Suggestion: had happened
...ating that this could be true, if fires would have happened every year. But, since the 1988, there ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, third, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19191919192 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51070557522 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612794612795 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0961357037 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.8 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06452816374 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321190105318 0.272083759551 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108180419544 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876779795037 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184474369478 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160150706099 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.