TPO 23-integrated
Both the reading and the lecture are contemplating about yellow cedar's decline in population. The author mentions three different hypothesis to explain this decline and the professor refutes all of them.
First, the reading mentions that insect parasites can be the cause of this population decline. However, the lecture contradicts that by saying that healthy cedars are resistant to insect attacks for they have some chemicals in them that kill insects. and if there are some dead trees with cedar bark beetles on them, it's because the tree was already damaged or dead when the beetles attacked them.
Second, the author claims that brown bears may be the reason of the population decline. On the contrary, the lecturer illustrates that there is a population decline happening in all the north western parts of America, including the islands. But there bears don't live on these islands. So population decline is happening with or without the bears and for this reason bears can not be the cause of the decline.
Third, the reading passage states that gradual changes of climate can damage the roots in freezing climate and that can be the reason of this decline. On the other hand, the lecture opposes the hypothesis by saying that more trees are dying in lower elevations, which are warmer, than higher ones. So although cold and freezing climate makes the trees sensitive, it can't be a candidate for the cause of tree's decline.
- TPO 26- integrated 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Children rely too much on technology, like computers, smart phones, video games for fun and entertainment. Playing simpler toys or outside with friends would be better for children's development 80
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task 71
- Do you agree or disagree?people gain more happiness from their jobs than their social life. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to read or watch news presented by people with different views than people by similar views. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hypothesis' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hypotheses', 'hypothesises'.
Suggestion: hypotheses; hypothesises
...on. The author mentions three different hypothesis to explain this decline and the profess...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 251, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...me chemicals in them that kill insects. and if there are some dead trees with cedar...
^^^
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... trees with cedar bark beetles on them, its because the tree was already damaged or...
^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... including the islands. But there bears dont live on these islands. So population de...
^^^^
Line 4, column 366, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...g climate makes the trees sensitive, it cant be a candidate for the cause of trees d...
^^^^
Line 4, column 366, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'cants'?
Suggestion: cants
...g climate makes the trees sensitive, it cant be a candidate for the cause of trees d...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9875 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42598419318 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508333333333 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9278462028 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419355018104 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140790851728 0.0996497079465 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596135161226 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225131619939 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516108364195 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.