tpo 25
Tpo 25
The reading passage discussion is about the disability of clay jars in producing the electricity in the ancient time and provides three reasons for its claim. However, the professor thinks none of them is convincing, and they could generate electricity.
First, the text declares that for generating electricity with these tools, they must have metal wires, but there are not any wires with the clay jars. In contrast, the lecture states that local people found these clay jars and maybe they did not recognise the importance of the materials that were near these clays.
Second, the passage explains that these clay jars are completely like the copper cylinder that they hav e found in the ruin Seleucia. Hence, they think clay used to for keeping a sacred scroll like the Seleucia copper cylinders. However, the professor asserts that although these clay s are similar to the clays in Seleucia, this discovery does not prove that they just use for this purpose. It is true that by utilising iron and filling the jars, the electricity can be produced. This action used to for generating first batteries.
Third, the author tells that the ancient people had not any tools to use from the electricity, and it was useless for them. On the contrast, the professor tells that they could use electricity for magic power or ease the pain. In fact, if the jars had electricity, it would have produced the shock when people touch it since they could use it for magic poweق. Also, they could reduce the pain by joining the electricity to the muscles.
- tpo 26 3
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. 73
- Nowadays many movies or films are based on books Some people prefer to read the original book before they watch the movie other prefer to watch the movie before reading the book Which one do you prefer 62
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 71
- People learn easily from the friends beside them. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g, and they could generate electricity. First, the text declares that for genera...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... contrast, the lecture states that local people found these clay jars and maybe t...
^^^
Line 4, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e materials that were near these clays. Second, the passage explains that these ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this clay' or 'these clays'?
Suggestion: this clay; these clays
...er, the professor asserts that although these clay s are similar to the clays in Seleucia,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the clays in Seleucia, this discovery does not prove that they just use for th...
^^
Line 5, column 535, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...used to for generating first batteries. Third, the author tells that the ancient...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...joining the electricity to the muscles.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, third, in contrast, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86090225564 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42943547096 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537593984962 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1314169379 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4615384615 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396117374749 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147601943356 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537479763576 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228704519888 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484239678914 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.