TPO-25
The reading and the lecture are both about a function of an ancient architecture, which is a set of clay jars. The author of the reading believes that considering the jar, not as an electric battery rather than a pot by the ancient people. In contrast to that, the speaker casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He ponders that, the clay jars might be the kind of an electric battery.
Initially, the author of the reading points out that, lack of evidence is fundamental not to consider it as a battery. furthermore, It is mentioned that the lack of metal wire plays a great role to posit the statement. Whereas, the orator challenges this point. He tells that, it was excavated by the village people rather than the trained archaeologist. As a result, there is a possibility that it could be thrown or overlooked by them. From this point of view, we can't agree with the penman's statement.
After that, the originator of the reading contends that, looks like a copper cylinder. It is mentioned that the Selucia, an ancient society used a holder for sacred texts like it. But the lecturer rebuts on the statements also. He says that putting water on it, there is a possibility that it could be used as a battery.
Finally, Although, author of the reading tells us that for not having any devices to use the electricity generated from it, there is no purpose to have it as a battery, the speaker shows that it could be used as magical equipment to the magician as that time only a few were known about it. Beside another vivid example is, it might also be used as a healing medicine of pain through the doctor. So there is an inevitable possibility that it existed as a batter rather than a pot
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | supergirl20 | 40 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | mahan vahab kashi | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | SeehtEntity | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | negar.sh | 80 | view |
| 2019-05-20 | nahid77777777 | 78 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some people think that the government should spend as much money as possible in protecting the environment Other think money should be spent on other things such as education and healthcare Which one of these opinions do you agree with Use specific reason 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. 70
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
- TPO-25 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'an' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...onders that, the clay jars might be the kind of an electric battery. Initially, the autho...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...mental not to consider it as a battery. furthermore, It is mentioned that the lack of metal...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ys a great role to posit the statement. Whereas, the orator challenges this point. He t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 466, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ed by them. From this point of view, we cant agree with the penmans statement. Afte...
^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...t the lecturer rebuts on the statements also. He says that putting water on it, ther...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, look, so, whereas, in contrast, kind of, as a result, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52427184466 5.08290768461 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59402424487 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504854368932 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.5026280443 49.2860985944 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2352941176 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204715751354 0.272083759551 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561968990594 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05565251464 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124147848282 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457128509485 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.64 12.2367328918 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.