tpo 28
Both of article and professor discusses the possibily of Peary travel to the north pole. The text represents three reason for supports the authenticity of Peary travel. On the other hand, the lecturer remarks that there are not any solid evidence to back up Peary remarks and expresses the reason which have been mentioned in the passage are not persuasive. So, in the following the reasons will be represented.
Firstly, the professor says the committee which determine the authenticity of Peary remarks were subjective. They were Peary friends which were contributing large money for Peary trips. Besides, their examination last only 2 days. So, it is highly probable which they did not check the records carefully. However, the article contends that the society gathered a committee that was instructed.
Secondly, the lecturer claims there are some issues related to how fast he traveled. the professor says Avery took his food via airplane. Consequently his weight was less than Peary in his trip. Plus the weather in Peary trip was not good. So, their trip cannot last the same. On the other hand, the text provides some information which Avery use the same kind of dogsled and his trip last less than 37 days.
Finally, the professor put forward that the photograph not proves any thing. Because in 100 years ago the cameras were not so precise which we can deduce the position of sun. Plus, photos become blour over time. Therfore, the shadows on the photos cannot determine the exact position of the sun. While, the article mentions the photographs which have been taken by Peary strongly supports his claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...issues related to how fast he traveled. the professor says Avery took his food via ...
^^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
... says Avery took his food via airplane. Consequently his weight was less than Peary in his t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Avery) must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
...t provides some information which Avery use the same kind of dogsled and his trip l...
^^^
Line 7, column 67, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
... forward that the photograph not proves any thing. Because in 100 years ago the cameras w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...at the photograph not proves any thing. Because in 100 years ago the cameras were not s...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 298, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...etermine the exact position of the sun. While, the article mentions the photographs w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, then, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02592592593 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47124755374 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1096496707 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.85 110.228320801 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5 21.698381199 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.27373068433 304% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317528981287 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088775948214 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753090171926 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183322952735 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271379424279 0.0443174109184 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.