Robert E Peary, a famous adventurer and arctic explorer, had reached the North Pole in his journey or not. The author of the reading passage presents three reasons for demonstrating that he reached the North Pole on April 7, 1909. However, the lecturer believes none of the reasons could precisely explain the claim.
The author argues that the National Geographic Society's investigation proves that Peary had reached the North Pole according to documents and records. The lecturer argues against this reason and believes that the National Geographic Societies report is unreliable, for this committee consists of Peary's friends. Moreover, they financially supported Peary's journey. In addition, it took two days to reach conclusion. As a result, the conclusions are biased and unreliable.
Furthermore, the reading passage asserts that Tom Avery, a British explorer, used the same type of equipment and made the same journey in less than 37 days. This indicates that Peary's claims are authentic. Nevertheless, the lecturer illustrates that the conditions in which Avery reached the North Pole completely different from Peary's. Moreover, even if Peary and Avery used the same dogsled, Avery's dogsled was much thinner than Peary's, for Avery's food has been dropped along the way. Moreover, Avery reports include very favorable weather conditions, opposite the peary's reports. Consequently, this claim does not have strong support to be acceptable.
Finally, the reading asserts that the photographs confirm that Peary has reached North Pole. The lecturer opposes this point by explaining that photos are blurred and the camera used is not good. Therefore, the shadows in the picture can not demonstrate the exact position. Furthermore, we can not establish a dog's exact position. Accordingly, the photographs could not be a strong evidence to support the claim.
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 80
- TPO-46 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.Use specific reasons and exam 60
- TPO-32 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 488, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ys food has been dropped along the way. Moreover, Avery reports include very favorable w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a dog' or simply 'dogs'?
Suggestion: a dog; dogs
...tion. Furthermore, we can not establish a dogs exact position. Accordingly, the photog...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46712802768 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76948930312 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567474048443 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2881272275 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1578947368 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2105263158 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.504895093968 0.272083759551 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137871645058 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901879756848 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291559078729 0.162205337803 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438573761293 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.85 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.