TPO 31
Addressing the origin of a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones of the found fossil of dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, the passage discusses criticisms around the theory which attributes these lines to feathers. The lecturer, on the other hand, claims that those objections are not convincing since there are strong scientific evidences proving the fact that Sinosauropteryx had feathers. She responds to criticisms as you may find in the following paragraphs.
The lecturer refutes the point made by the passage that they are not the remained parts of an alive Sinosauropteryx, rather after they have buried in ash the process of decomposition have actually created lines. The fact that other animals' bodies buried in the same site have completely preserved results in this refutation. Due to this, the lecturer believes that there are unlikely to be fibers as a result of decomposition.
In addition, the reading indicates that even if we supposedly accept they are a part of dinosaurs' bodies, not enough evidence which can precisely attribute them to feathers not other bodies' parts have been found. Specifically, since some of the dinosaurs had frills. the probability of being frills not feathers exists as well. By contrast, since the chemical structure of feathers and frills are totally different, feathers contain a kind of protein called beta carbonate but frills have not, their nature could be easily proved by checking the remains' chemical constituents.
The question of the found remanents' function is the last criticism the passage has arisen. By considering the only conceivable functionalities of feathers which are a tool for fly and thermoregulation, the reading argues that the location of these lines along the backbones and tails which make them useless for those actions indicates they could not be feathers. In contrast, the lecturer asserts that the functions of feathers are not just those mentioned earlier. Because as we can observe in some types of birds, they can be a charming tool for attracting the suitable mate. This argument would be reinforced if we knew there are witnesses showing us the probable color of feathers was an appealing combination of orange and white.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 76
- Leader or president feature 70
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 70
- TPO 40 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ts have been found. Specifically, since some of the dinosaurs had frills. the probability o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...since some of the dinosaurs had frills. the probability of being frills not feather...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'well', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'kind of', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.255208333333 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.169270833333 0.158904122519 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0703125 0.0723426182421 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0520833333333 0.0435111971325 120% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0364583333333 0.0277247811725 132% => OK
Prepositions: 0.143229166667 0.128828473217 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0572916666667 0.0370669169778 155% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.95800937799 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0130208333333 0.0208969081088 62% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.135416666667 0.128158765124 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0182291666667 0.0158828679856 115% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0104166666667 0.0114777025283 91% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2230.0 1645.83664459 135% => OK
No of words: 355.0 271.125827815 131% => OK
Chars per words: 6.28169014085 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.04852973271 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388732394366 0.374372842146 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.304225352113 0.287516216867 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.233802816901 0.187439937562 125% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.152112676056 0.113142543107 134% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95800937799 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540845070423 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 58.989714092 53.8517498576 110% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.6666666667 21.7502111507 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.114636291 49.3711431718 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.666666667 132.220823453 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 21.7502111507 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.733333333333 0.878197800319 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 54.0892018779 50.5018328374 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.76767676768 1.90840788429 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.749009029007 0.549887131256 136% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.109778031951 0.142949733639 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0533328571658 0.0787303798458 68% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.60025714822 0.631733273073 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.11984286339 0.139662658121 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.359334132357 0.266732575781 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119033377767 0.103435571967 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.458554114154 0.414875509568 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.065987729737 0.0530846634433 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.584653740758 0.40443939384 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704921962018 0.0528353158467 133% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.