In view of the reading, the author argues that the different source has been guessed for the frog croaks sound which called quackers because of its Russion source for calling frog, by pointing out 3 reasons of support. Finding the statements questionable, the lecturer casts doubt on the claims made by the article and present evidence in contrary.
At first, the author argues that strange sound could be synced to whale which produced it during a courtship ritual. It is due to the fact that not only are the whales inhabited on this region, but also they can emit the sound like quackers when they try to attract a male. Conversely the lecturer brings up the idea that these whales are all in surface of the ocean but the submarine can detect only the deep one's. so this had been never happened.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that the resource of the sound is giant squid owing to their complex brains which grant theeem the ability to create such this sounds. On the other hand the lecturer disputes this idea by clarifying the fact that this sound detected on 1960s to 1980s but the giant squid leave the ocean before that so, this never ever could occured.
Finally, the author asserts creating this sound by other military tech which were not vividly patrolling the area as the last point for supporting the source of the quackers sound. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by saying that this sound emit fast and move directly and there is no military technology to move such fast and also queit.
- sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. do you agree or disagree with the following statement? the group will be helped more by a person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by a person who often strongly insist 73
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 78
- TPO 51 3
- TPO-32 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 70
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...ackers when they try to attract a male. Conversely the lecturer brings up the idea that th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 417, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ubmarine can detect only the deep ones. so this had been never happened. In addit...
^^
Line 2, column 425, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'had' and 'been'.
Suggestion: had never been
... can detect only the deep ones. so this had been never happened. In addition, the reading pas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, if, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70149253731 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18978673876 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555970149254 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.5419014573 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 21.698381199 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287965775012 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107032313997 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585478832362 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163850487678 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619360612495 0.0443174109184 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.