TPO 38- Integrated writing
The world's forests are facing increasing pressure which, if unchecked, will threaten the health of many industries, economies, nations, and lives. The development of an international fund to help developing countries implement useful conservation techniques in forest protection is the best way to protect the world's forests and hopefully reverse negative trends that imperil our forests.
The eading part and the lecture both discuss international founf as a solotion for the issue of forest productuin. In the reading part the author mentiones that there are several advantages for this solutio. In the listening part, however, the speaker challenges what the author states and rebutes the reasons.
To begin with, as mentioned in the artickle the author sets forth that they have enormous merits for farmland to being protected from environmentally damages; nevertheless, in the listening part, the speaker refuts the reasons asserting that it could be cause of rasing of harvests. Indeed, modern agriculture make pests, which is the cause of water pollution. it would be harmfull for land and animals.
Secondly, the author sets point that the economical benefiths for local people are very high. Nontheless, the speaker flatlly contradicts the idea ann contends that the money of internatinonal donates would not end up with lands. there is no benefiths for local people. they cannot reacive money form governments.
Finally, the author claims that it maintains valuable forsrs and protect species from extionction. In contrast, the professor is of the opinion that spend money on diverosity has commercial perposes, thefore forests monitoring indicate that it could be much bether to poyect forests rather that enadequatet fuond and mobey from internatual governments.
- TPO 41 Independent writingDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Tpo22Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 76
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing TaskThe cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful i 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements When people succeed, it is entirely because of hard work. Luck has noting to do with their success. 70
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing TaskThe cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful i 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...uts the reasons asserting that it could be cause of rasing of harvests. Indeed, modern a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... which is the cause of water pollution. it would be harmfull for land and animals....
^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...al donates would not end up with lands. there is no benefiths for local people. they ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...there is no benefiths for local people. they cannot reacive money form governments. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1178.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4537037037 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82986655494 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62037037037 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 74.4589745356 49.2860985944 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1666666667 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0291404023606 0.272083759551 11% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0104882512657 0.0996497079465 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0189251596547 0.0662205650399 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0182432120043 0.162205337803 11% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012742989606 0.0443174109184 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.