tpo 39
The reading passage claims that there are several theories describe the mass extinction and elimination of many different species at the end of the Triassic period. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some impeccable evidence to refute them all.
First, the author embraces the idea that sea level had fluctuated and the decrease in sea level created some problems for species, which lived in shallow water. In contrast, the lecturer underlines the fact that although scientists agreed with the decline of sea level, it has occurred over several years. So, this mass extinction takes place during a short period of time.
The author also holds the view that massive volcanic eruption caused Solphore Dioxide emitted to the atmosphere and cooling climate took place during this period, which caused extinction. On the contrary, the professor brings up the idea that this process is still present in the atmosphere and help the atmosphere be clearer and combine with other materials to cause rain. So, hardly can this process caused mass extinction during a Triassic period.
Finally, as set forth by the author asteroid hits the earth could be another explanation for this extinction because it blocked sunlight long enough for species to die. Conversely, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that very few scientists believe this fact because no site hitting by the asteroid has been found. In fact, despite founding crater in some places, it is dated to two million years before extinction happened.
Having scrutinized all the premises, a logical conclusion that can be drawn is that there are pieces of evidence having been ignored by the author while the presence of which could strengthen the author's claim.
- tpo 48 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 73
- "Last October the city of Belleville installed high-intensity lighting in its central business district, and vandalism there declined within a month. The city of Amburg has recently begun police patrols on bicycles in its business district, but the rate o 59
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 73
- Some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while others think realistic goals are more important. Which do you prefer and why? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... the mass extinction and elimination of many different species at the end of the Triassic peri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s extinction takes place during a short period of time. The author also holds the view that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s extinction during a Triassic period. Finally, as set forth by the author aste...
^^^
Line 9, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich could strengthen the authors claim.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, still, then, while, in contrast, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19649122807 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4487256502 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582456140351 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2865131678 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.416666667 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.