TPO 4
The reading and the lecture are both about dinosaures, which is about they are endotherms or not. The author of readings believes that there is considerable evidence for proving this fact, but the lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. She thinks that many scientists have problem with it.
First of all, the author claims that one reason for being endotherm is that dinosaurs lived in the polar region. He believes that only endotherms can live, and do not die in polar region. This point is challenged by the lecture. She says that polar region was warmer than today. Furthermore, she points out if they lived in these regions they can hibernate like other animals or migrate to warmer places in harsh weather condition.
Secondly, the authors states that position of leg is another reason for proving that dinosaures were endotherms. He argues that the position of legs in dinosaues are in the same place as the endotherms. This argument is rebutted by the lecture. She suggests they have big energy for running and they have more weight and large size.
Finally, the author mentions that the bones in endotherm have Haversian canals. He is of the opinion that the presence of this structures in dinosaure is a good evidence that these animals were endotherms. The lecture, on the other hand, feels that it is not true. She puts forth the idea that endotherms grow rapidly in every enviromental condition evevn in very cool weather, but one study about dinosaures indicates that they grow slowly in the cooler periodd.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25 0.261695866417 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.166666666667 0.158904122519 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0659722222222 0.0723426182421 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0347222222222 0.0435111971325 80% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0555555555556 0.0277247811725 200% => OK
Prepositions: 0.163194444444 0.128828473217 127% => OK
Participles: 0.0243055555556 0.0370669169778 66% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.45709349271 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00347222222222 0.0208969081088 17% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00347222222222 0.00154638098197 225% => OK
Determiners: 0.114583333333 0.128158765124 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00694444444444 0.0158828679856 44% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00694444444444 0.0114777025283 61% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1544.0 1645.83664459 94% => OK
No of words: 262.0 271.125827815 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89312977099 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.320610687023 0.374372842146 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.24427480916 0.287516216867 85% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.171755725191 0.187439937562 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0992366412214 0.113142543107 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45709349271 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545801526718 0.539623497131 101% => OK
Word variations: 53.9443198598 53.8517498576 100% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.375 21.7502111507 75% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9445673548 49.3711431718 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 132.220823453 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 21.7502111507 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 0.878197800319 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 40.802480916 50.5018328374 81% => OK
Elegance: 1.7027027027 1.90840788429 89% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0818541242718 0.142949733639 57% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.068656043677 0.0787303798458 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.515003827478 0.631733273073 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.146946990312 0.139662658121 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.398309101074 0.414875509568 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0790947281394 0.0530846634433 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.