The reading and the lecture are both contradicting with each other, in terms of the existence of dinosaurs as an endotherm. The author of the article states that since the dinosaurs were reptiles, they could not be an endotherm. However, the lecturer casts doubt about the claim mentioned in the article and refutes all the theories presented in the article.
First of all, according to the passage fossils of dinosaurs in the polar region is the evidence which leads to the conclusion that dinosaurs were endotherm since they must be required to maintain their body temperature in extremely cold climate similarily as other endotherm animals do. On the contrary, the speaker negates the argument presented in the passage. Furthermore, he discusses that there was a possibility that dinosaurs could be migrated to the warmer region in cold climate or used to follow hibernation, and that way, they do not need to maintain their body temperature.
Secondly, the author posits that the position of dinosaur's legs under the body is the evidence that proves that they are not like other reptiles, so their legs were made for running and therefore, they were endotherm animal. Although the lecturer refutes this by asserting that in order to support their huge weight, their legs were placed underneath their body, and it does not have any relation to the physiological activity, like running.
Finally, it is mentioned in the article that having Haversian canals in dinosaur's bone is the strong indicator which proves that they are endotherm. On the other hand, the speaker again opposes the solution and describes that it is true that dinosaurs had Haversian canal in their bone but they had some growth rings as well which indicates the period of time when their growth was stopped or they were growing slow due to protect themselves in extreme cold. However, endotherm animals always show constant and rapid growth. Thus, rapid growth pattern following the slow growth with again rapid growth was the indicator that dinosaurs were not an endotherm.
- TPO 34Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on the cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and 73
- TPO 21(independent)Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 80
- TPO32 73
- TPO 16 – taks 2: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The best way to travel is to travel in a group led by a tour guide. 70
- TPO 31- Task 1 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he theories presented in the article. First of all, according to the passage f...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to maintain their body temperature. Secondly, the author posits that the pos...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... physiological activity, like running. Finally, it is mentioned in the article ...
^^^
Line 7, column 346, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rowth rings as well which indicates the period of time when their growth was stopped or they w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, first of all, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 337.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10979228487 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5720653336 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483679525223 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.775059246 49.2860985944 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.5 110.228320801 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0833333333 21.698381199 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 7.06452816374 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.