Based on given materials, the article as well as lecture discusses the possibility of maintenance a permanent human presence on Venus. The author states that the main problem of presence of humans on Venus. That being said, the lecturer provide a solution which is to establish a station above of Venus' surface to repudiate this claim.
Initially, the author says that atmospheric pressure at Venus is at least 90 times greater than the pressure at Earth's surface. However, the lecturer explain that in the station above Venus, the pressure is equal to Earth's atmospheric pressure. Based on the theory which said by increasing the height, the atmospheric pressure would be decrease. Thus, the first problem is solved by this way.
Second, the writer proclaims that there no reservoirs of water and oxygen on Venus' surface. Yet again, the speaker underscores that problem by a solution. He illustrates that in the station above Venus people could use chemical process to turn carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid into water and oxygen. Consequently, chemical process solves the problem.
The final contention between reading and listening passages is How to reach the sunlight in Venus. The author thinks very little sunlight reaches the planet's surface. On the other hand, the speaker explains that the clouds above the station are not very thick. They could use reflection of the clouds to reach sunlight in the station. In addition, they can save the sunlight to make electricity. As a result, reach the sunlight seems functional at above the Venus' surface.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, second, so, thus, well, at least, in addition, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16141732283 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60200481184 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523622047244 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.811054358 49.2860985944 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.1176470588 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9411764706 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424085017858 0.272083759551 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128203990773 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755970596476 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238914212323 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336975950924 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.