TPO-42
The reading claims that milions of birds are inuring from glasses since they try to fly through of windows. The author elaborates his viewpoints for the solutions in three main reasons. Nevertheless, the professor believs that none of them are effective to stop from birds harmed and refutes aech of the author's reasons.
First, the reading avers that replace one-way glass which is transparant in one direction as solution since birds can detect it as a barrier. However, the professor refutes this concept by stating that one-way glass reflected as a mirror; hence, like regular mirror can reflect the sky or the various tree and is not well response.
Furthermore, the article posits that painting colorful lines on the glass could become the general design of buildings by architects and prevent from hiting by birds. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up the fact that with this design as people could sea the outside of the buldings if the lines were less; so, birds think they are holes in the windows and fly through them. Also, he mentioned that if the lines become more and more in order to make it possible to detect by birds, but it will make inside of the buldings dark.
Finally, the article asserts that magnetic artifacial field in order to make birds away from the buldings since they have natural ability to sense this field. Contrary, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim by stating that birds only use from magnetic navigation ability on the long distance trips. In addition, he mentione that they only use it in winter season when they are migerating from cold to warm and do not use it in the short distance trip. Birds only use their eyes and brightness of the light in the short trips.
- Integrated WritingIn the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies t 3
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
- TPO 29 90
- TPO 49. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 73
- TPO-21 - Integrated Writing Task Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, g 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75919732441 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29661438777 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531772575251 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1793419206 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.583333333 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428343360129 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143982717332 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813824097891 0.0662205650399 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228775787087 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182520021845 0.0443174109184 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 53.8541721854 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.