The passage and the lecture both discuss the ways to prevents birds hitting the glass windows and offer two opposing views on it. The author in the passage states that there some solutions for this problem and suggests three of them. However, the professor in the lecture challenges the suggestions stated by the author and refutes all of the solutions by proving them scientifically wrong.
First of all, the author highlights that it is possible to avoid birds trying to fly through the window by using one-way glass. Not having been convinced, the speaker asserts that one-way glass will act like a mirror. He proceeds to say that birds do not understand mirrors and they think of the reflections of these glasses as the real sky. Therefore, they will try to fly through them.
Moreover, the reading contends that by using colorful patterns on the windows can stop birds flying through the window. On the contrary, the professor declares that birds see these designs as holes and consequently, they will try to fly through them, unless the holes are designed very small. He continues to say that these small patterns can block the view of the people who live inside the building. As a result, this suggestion does not work out.
Finally, the lecture does not approve the third solution provided by the reading passage which is emitting electromagnetic signals to keep birds away from the construction. The professor propounds that birds use Earth's magnetic field only when they travel over long distances. For example they use it navigate while they immigrate from cold areas to warmer places. He delineates that birds use eyes and brightness of light for short distance flights. Thus, using electromagnetic equipment will be in vain and practically, useless.
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 83
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture, yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds. Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air, millions of birds are harmed every year when the 86
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 86
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...stions stated by the author and refutes all of the solutions by proving them scientificall...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'navigates'?
Suggestion: navigates
...long distances. For example they use it navigate while they immigrate from cold areas to...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'thus', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.218068535826 0.261695866417 83% => OK
Verbs: 0.183800623053 0.158904122519 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0560747663551 0.0723426182421 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0529595015576 0.0435111971325 122% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0498442367601 0.0277247811725 180% => OK
Prepositions: 0.13707165109 0.128828473217 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0467289719626 0.0370669169778 126% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.59560296882 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0280373831776 0.0208969081088 134% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.1246105919 0.128158765124 97% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.018691588785 0.0158828679856 118% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00934579439252 0.0114777025283 81% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1770.0 1645.83664459 108% => OK
No of words: 293.0 271.125827815 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0409556314 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.344709897611 0.374372842146 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.283276450512 0.287516216867 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.170648464164 0.187439937562 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.098976109215 0.113142543107 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59560296882 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566552901024 0.539623497131 105% => OK
Word variations: 59.5799406451 53.8517498576 111% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.3125 21.7502111507 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5921354255 49.3711431718 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.625 132.220823453 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 21.7502111507 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 46.6401450512 50.5018328374 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.40217391304 1.90840788429 73% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.615395462926 0.549887131256 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.134606209046 0.142949733639 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0862014318172 0.0787303798458 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.542314273043 0.631733273073 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.185899974323 0.139662658121 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242522816323 0.266732575781 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108723036 0.103435571967 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.403841482527 0.414875509568 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0545502120991 0.0530846634433 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.441397068436 0.40443939384 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555961658922 0.0528353158467 105% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.62251655629 166% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.2958057395 136% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.