TPO 43
In this set of materials, the reading passage states that agnostids were a group of marine animals that lived 450 million years ago, and scientists do not have information about how they eat or how they behaved, so the reading passage provides 3 theories about agnostids ate and behaved. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading points by providing different reasons (and examples).
First, the reading passage indicates that the agnostids may have been free-swimming predators because other types of arthropods were free-swimming predators. In contrast, the lecturer believes that the free-swimming predators are live in an open ocean, and they have well developer eyes to easily see their prays. But, the agnostids had tiny poor eyes, and some of them were blind. In this situation, they must have other sensor organs that used for finding prays. However, their fossils do not show this organ.
Furthermore, the reading argues that the agnostids may have been seen dwellers because other types of arthropods living in this way; conversely, what the lecturer believes is different. She says that the see dweller animals cannot move fast or go to a far distance. They only stay in the localized era in small geographic place and also move slowly. But, the agnostids lived in multiple place and era that shows they may move fast from one place to other places. So, it is unusual that the agnostids were seen, dwellers.
Finally, according to the reading, the agnostids may have been parasites that live on other animals body. However, the professor believes that the parasites population do not very large because they live on the host's body. If their population become large, they may kill host animals. Nevertheless, the agnostids population were very large, and they could not become parasites.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | m.ghoroobi | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | view | |
| 2022-09-03 | Allenwlh | 70 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | lhklin | 75 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 21, column 148, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parasites'' or 'parasite's'?
Suggestion: parasites'; parasite's
...owever, the professor believes that the parasites population do not very large because th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20401337793 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57579805679 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518394648829 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.7797464587 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.25 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.497315424569 0.272083759551 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164168111212 0.0996497079465 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108028602103 0.0662205650399 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307175237451 0.162205337803 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494320745211 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.