TPO 44
The reading and the listening materials have a debate on originallity of founded silver coins in a historical site of the United States. The passage begins with an idea that concerns about the coins that are fake and located to the place recently. The penman puts forwards 3 main theories that are disapproved by the following orator.
First of all, the writer suggests that the distance among living place of norse and the maine site most be consider because it is more than a normal amount to walk by ancient people. The speaker views this issue from an opposite angle, according to him, native americans traveled great distances and changed the place of many other objects during the time.
The second point offered by the author is that a problem of founding any other coins in connection to the case. Conversely, the lecturer casts doubt on this assumption by saying that there is no evidence to prove a stable place that be for norse to live in. Thus, they didn't have permanent settlement and it is possible for them to change their habitat.
Third, the reading passage proposes that silver coins were priceless and the native americans did not pay attention of them as a kind of money. On the other hand, the professor holds a different perspective that is about the attractivness of silver coins for ancient people of the North America and they used to have silver necless and other interesting objects by this appealing material.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...fake and located to the place recently. The penman puts forwards 3 main theories th...
^^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...hat be for norse to live in. Thus, they didnt have permanent settlement and it is pos...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, second, so, third, thus, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82661290323 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47495256894 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576612903226 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3237244718 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.7 110.228320801 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418623157595 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1410046589 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683571026574 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22481934703 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474972759123 0.0443174109184 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.