TPO 47

Essay topics

The passage suggests that there are many paleontologists doubt that Pterosaurs cannot fly. But the professor in the listening material does not think so. She think Pterosaurs can fly.

Firstly, the passage said that pterosaurs were probably cold-blooded and they may not have enough energy for them to fly. However, the professor suggests that pterosaurs did not need energy to maintain their temperature for they were cold-blooded. And then they can supply the energy fast.

Secondly, the passage said that the weight of Pterosaurs is too heavy to fly and its size is too big to fly. But the professor does not think so. She said that Pterosaurs had hollow light bones. So Pterosaurs' weight lower than giraffe's.

Finally,the passage said that Pterosaurs have no good method to take off from the ground. The professor argues that Pterosaurs do not need the elements what birds have for they are not the same as birds. The Pterosaurs launch themselves from other places while birds launch themselves from ground.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...stening material does not think so. She think Pterosaurs can fly. Firstly, the pas...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...s weight lower than giraffes. Finally,the passage said that Pterosaurs have no go...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 30.3222958057 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 1373.03311258 62% => OK
No of words: 167.0 270.72406181 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11377245509 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6204019745 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 145.348785872 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51497005988 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 419.366225166 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6350057153 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.6923076923 110.228320801 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.8461538462 21.698381199 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340387228204 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123381598198 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787572002828 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206735541366 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.09175192103 0.0443174109184 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.3589403974 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.47 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.78 8.42419426049 80% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 63.6247240618 42% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.