TPO 47
In this set of materials the reading passage discusse that some of palentologists do not accept that the Prerosaurs were able to flying. While in ythe listening the professor casts doubts on what is peresented in the text and believes that the recent finding shows that the Prerosaurs are completely capable top flying.
First of all, in the text it is clearly mentioned that the Prerosaurs were cold blood animal and so the rate of their metabolism could not provided enough enery to support flight. However, the professor claims that they had very dense hair over arpound their body like some of today worm blood animals. This dense cover hepled them to maintain their body tempretur and their body metabolism can produce enough energy to supply flight.
In addition, the professor diagrees with this idea that the weight of Prerosaurs could provided dam for flight. She says that this animals had very light hallow bons. Presence of this light bons insted of dense bones made their body weight low enough and able them to flight.
Finally, in the text it is stated that the palentologists do not find any evidence that shows that palentologists like todays birds had the ability of take off that this ability is necessary for flying. The professor subscribes that there is one important different between birds and palentologists. the birds have two logs but palentologists had four legs palentologists like bits and this four legs could push them to take off.
- TPO 31 73
- For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities 58
- People learn things better from those at their own level- such as fellow students or co workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers or supervisors. 73
- Do you agree or not?Because people are busy doing so many things, they do very few things well. 76
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
... the rate of their metabolism could not provided enough enery to support flight. However...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...dea that the weight of Prerosaurs could provided dam for flight. She says that this anim...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... provided dam for flight. She says that this animals had very light hallow bons. Pre...
^^^^
Line 4, column 300, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...erent between birds and palentologists. the birds have two logs but palentologists...
^^^
Line 4, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...entologists. the birds have two logs but palentologists had four legs palentologi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97967479675 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5852028634 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516260162602 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5943447594 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.363636364 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182579197468 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730983793066 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528328466618 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107703417763 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540231875357 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.