tpo 47
The reading and the lecture is both about whether pterosaurs were capable of powered flight. The author states that there are several arguments have been made against powered flight and gives three reason to support that. On the other hand, Professor claims that Pterosaurs may have been capable of powered flight.
First, the author states that according to modern reptiles are cold-blooded as well as ancient reptiles such as pterosaurs. The reading also claims that cold-blooded animals have a slow metabolism . However, Professor counters this statement by saying that discovered fossils indicate Pterosaurs have dense hair and familiar duel and this feature are typical for warm climates. Because of that professor states that pterosaur can't be cold-blooded.
Second, in the reading claims that powered flight can't keep all animals airbone due to limit for weight and considering that pterosaurs are so heavy, they can't even flap their wings. On the other hand, Professor counters that because of Pretasours anatomical feature, they are light for their size. Their bone is hallow and kept them low.
Third, the author states that powered flight make take off from the ground possible for all animals except large Pretasours. However,ın the lecture refutes that ıf pretasours were birds, it would be impossible to take off the from ground. The professor supports this statement by pointing birds use 2 hinds limbs and they push to take off by using those legs, on the other hand Pretasours had 4 limbs to push itself. According to studies even large pretasours can jump and push themselves without any trouble.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d-blooded animals have a slow metabolism . However, Professor counters this statem...
^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... feature are typical for warm climates. Because of that professor states that pterosaur...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...of that professor states that pterosaur cant be cold-blooded. Second, in the read...
^^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... the reading claims that powered flight cant keep all animals airbone due to limit f...
^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ring that pterosaurs are so heavy, they cant even flap their wings. On the other han...
^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'hallowed'.
Suggestion: hallowed
...are light for their size. Their bone is hallow and kept them low. Third, the author...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , ın
...animals except large Pretasours. However,ın the lecture refutes that ıf pretasours ...
^^^
Line 7, column 227, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[3]
Message: Did you mean 'form'?
Suggestion: form
... it would be impossible to take off the from ground. The professor supports this sta...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, may, second, so, third, well, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49072795049 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2040715246 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410670239111 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141540946163 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660723986118 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23760781058 0.162205337803 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542507713118 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.