TPO 47 Integrated writing
Although the reading states that pterosaurs are uncapable of powered flight, the listening contradicts this from three aspects.
First of all, from the fossils scientists found hair or fur, which indicates that pterosaurs are much likely to be warm-blooded animals rather than cold-blooded animals said in the reading. This is because hair is helpful to maintain a high body temperature. As a result, with a high metabolism rate, pterosaurs are able to supply enough energy for powered flight.
Secondly, despite the reading points out that pterosaurs are too heavy for powered flight, the listening disagrees this statement by saying they are unusually light. For example, their bones are hollow rather than solid, so that they can keep their weight low. In addition, they have flipping wings.
Last but not least, the listening makes an argument that there are differences between pterosaurs and birds. Unlike birds jump or run to gain speed needed for taking off, pterosaurs use their four limps together to push off the ground, which can be also seen on some modern birds such as bats. With four legs, pterosaurs are able to fast enough and jump high enough and definitely powered flight is reachable for them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 199.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1608040201 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49861455007 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633165829146 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2813137238 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.7 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.