The lecture and the reading passage both discuss endangered species of frogs and their extinction and the ways that can be applied to prevent the decrease in frogs population and offer two oppsoing views on these solutions. The passage highlights that the populations of frogs can be saved by using these methods. However, the lecture challenges what the passage proposes and refutes them because they are not practically useful.
First of all, the author of the passage highlights that the population of frogs can be saved by imposing a ligal restriction on the use of pesticides, which a chemical poison used against incests, due to its harmful effects of frogs. Not having been convinced, the speaker asserts that this is not a pragmatic resolutions for the problem. She proceeds to say that farmers are economically dependent on this poison and imposing strict laws agaist it will definitely affects the amount of their crops and as a result, their products will not able to compete with other farmers' and that's why this solution is not fair.
Moreover, the passage contends that frogs should be treated on a large scale by the newly discovered medication to be able to survive agaisnt negative effects of the fungus. On the contrary, the professor declares that this solution is impractical. She elaborates that this treatment must be administered on every individual frog which is impossible to catch all of the population of the frogs in an area. Furthermore, this treatment must be done to every new generations of frogs which make it more impossible.
The lecture does not approve the third solution stated by the passage which is limitting the use of water for developments in human societies. She contends that the global warming is the major contributor to the destruction of frogs' habitats, not human activities. Therefore, if we want to preserve the frogs, we have to find a way to control the global warming.
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 66
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 70
- TPO-42 - Independent Writing Task Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 58
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'resolution'?
Suggestion: resolution
...er asserts that this is not a pragmatic resolutions for the problem. She proceeds to say th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'affect'
Suggestion: affect
...g strict laws agaist it will definitely affects the amount of their crops and as a resu...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... able to compete with other farmers and thats why this solution is not fair. Moreo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...idual frog which is impossible to catch all of the population of the frogs in an area. Fur...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.231213872832 0.261695866417 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.164739884393 0.158904122519 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0751445086705 0.0723426182421 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0491329479769 0.0435111971325 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0375722543353 0.0277247811725 136% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121387283237 0.128828473217 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0491329479769 0.0370669169778 133% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77445070109 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0346820809249 0.0208969081088 166% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.14450867052 0.128158765124 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0231213872832 0.0158828679856 146% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0202312138728 0.0114777025283 176% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1931.0 1645.83664459 117% => OK
No of words: 321.0 271.125827815 118% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01557632399 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.345794392523 0.374372842146 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.305295950156 0.287516216867 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.196261682243 0.187439937562 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.130841121495 0.113142543107 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77445070109 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523364485981 0.539623497131 97% => OK
Word variations: 54.2797010993 53.8517498576 101% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.6923076923 21.7502111507 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0672207274 49.3711431718 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.538461538 132.220823453 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 21.7502111507 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 0.878197800319 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 55.2219027079 50.5018328374 109% => OK
Elegance: 1.59770114943 1.90840788429 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.480530771017 0.549887131256 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.156930600641 0.142949733639 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0926125269413 0.0787303798458 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.645482593797 0.631733273073 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.116094199475 0.139662658121 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.22544292255 0.266732575781 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701597777209 0.103435571967 68% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.470538426214 0.414875509568 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.013235553497 0.0530846634433 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.344472060262 0.40443939384 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269342372735 0.0528353158467 51% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.