TPO 52
Based on the set of material, the article proposes three main advantages to support that colonization of asteroids. On the other hand, the lecturer in the listening casts doubt the information which is presented in the passage.
First of all, the writer asserts that it is safer to land on an asteroids due to the low gravity than other planet, and carry more equipment in the spaceship. However, the speaker in the lecture claims that there is downside for this point in the reading passage. Low gravity will cause severe health problem to human being such as losing muscle density and bone density in a few months. Thus, first point in the reading does not hold the water.
In addition, the author demonstrates that asteroids contain valuable metals which are rare in Earth. Yet again, the professor refutes this opinion and posits that considering cost of transportation and market price of the rare elements, the profit of asteroids will be set off. If the supply of one rare metal increases drastically, the price of this metal will drop then the profit of colony cannot be as much as discussed in the passage.
Despite the statement in the reading passage that some asteroids are closer than Moon which it is much easier to land on and return from Earth, the professor reputes that it will hard to return to Earth from asteroids. For sometimes the asteroids are at the close point to Earth, but it will not stay here. Asteroids travels further away than Mars, then it is a challenge for astronauts coming back to Earth. Therefore, the last point of article is untenable from professor's explanation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-10 | sonyeoso | 81 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | AT2G38040 | 85 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | parsaramezan | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | lutzuming | 85 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | Percival Wong | 81 | view |
- TPO 50 3
- TPO 48 Integrated 73
- Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is viewed as a bad quality for a person to have. But now it’s considered as a good quality of a person. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 70
- TPO 52 100
- Summary the points in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points in the reading passage. 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... untenable from professors explanation.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85507246377 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54484046267 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528985507246 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7463967823 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.076923077 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06452816374 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.