TPO 53- integrated cigarettes high taxation is good since it discourages people from buying bad things, it is financially fair, and it is a great revenue for the government.
The article asserts that imposing taxes on harmful products, such as cigarretes and junk foods, is beneficial. The professor, on the other hand, overthrows all the explanations and says that these opinions can be challenged. In the following, her justifications, used to shed light on this convoluted controvesy, will be discussed thoroughly.
First of all, the reading claims that this taxing strategy will decrease the rate of growing bad habits among individuals since they will get used to spending less money on bad products. The lecturer, however, rejects this notion, mainly because she believes people will continue their bad habits by buying cheaper products which have lower qualities with even more harmful substances. This will definitely have greater health risks for them. Moreover, she thinks that although some may react to this taxation and stop buying those products, others will continue buying those expensive products and leave even less money on healthy things.
Secondly, The passage insists that this action is fair through the lens of financial issues as peopel who use unhealthy things will eventually need medical treatments, so they are actually paying for their own sake. The teacher declares that everybody thinks of fairness differently. Some might say this strategy of paying for consequences is fair. Others may believe it is unfair, mainly because they take into account incomes. For instance, compare a high-earning cigarette addict with a low-earning one. The taxation is relatively high for the latter person and is a serious obstacle for them.
Tertiary, the essay acknowledges that this process will be considered as an income for the government which can be exploited for medical and other beneficial issues. The educator thinks this goal has diverse downsides. As this taxation values millions of dollars for the government, it finally will be dependent on that revenue. Therefore, the government may not see the urge to eliminate bad habits and do radical measures. As an illustration, the government will not set the rules against smoking in public places insomuch as it does not want to lose that income channel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-16 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
- in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 73
- is risk taking and trying new things important part of being successful 76
- TPO 37 integrated TED is not a good device and approach for turtles the rate of their trap is not so much there are other more beneficial ways it cannot work for larger animals 80
- TPO 15 independent agree or not in order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at young age 73
- TPO 07 integratedwood companies do not like ecological certifications for three reasons:1, people do not distinguish their advertisements2, they are more expensive than regular woods3, this business is not competitive 85
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1373.03311258 133% => OK
No of words: 342.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72286127636 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 145.348785872 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6817182377 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273025399092 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767107856612 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412051156607 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1569802059 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194135355365 0.0443174109184 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 63.6247240618 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1373.03311258 133% => OK
No of words: 342.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72286127636 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 145.348785872 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6817182377 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273025399092 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767107856612 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412051156607 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1569802059 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194135355365 0.0443174109184 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 63.6247240618 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.