TPO INTEGRATED 43

Essay topics:

TPO INTEGRATED 43

The first area of dispute is the ability of the agnostide to live as free swimming predator. The lectures contends that free swimming predators should have large developed eye and special sensory organs in their bodies to help them catch the prey, however the angistoids  were lacking these characteristics. On the other hand, the reading opposes this point stating that they were strong predators and active swimmers.
 
 
Another controversial issue that the agntoid were dwellers of the sea flower. The lecture says that the dwellers of the sea flower were moving slowly. They localized in one area. However, angistoids  were moving too fast. According to their fossils they were localized in different places. But, the reading contradicts this point saying that they were living as dweller of the sea flower and scavenging dead organism and grazing bacteria.
 
The final point of dispute is that agnostide were parasites living on large organisms. The lecture claims that the parasites population should be small or they will kill the hosts  they feed on them. , I according to the fossils of angostide there population very large and that contradict the theory of parasites.yet , the reading refutes this point and saying that many anthropoids that are living those days are parasite, which reflect that agnosite were parasite also.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-01-15 Salu 70 view
2020-06-08 maya14 3 view
2019-12-18 lucasantunes 80 view
2019-10-24 fateme ozggoli 85 view
2019-03-05 ilda 85 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user mariem :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'contend'.
Suggestion: contend
...as free swimming predator. The lectures contends that free swimming predators should hav...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m catch the prey, however the angistoids  were lacking these characteristics. On t...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...strong predators and active swimmers.     Another controversial issue that the agn...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...calized in one area. However, angistoids  were moving too fast. According to their...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g dead organism and grazing bacteria.   The final point of dispute is that agnos...
^^^
Line 6, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parasites'' or 'parasite's'?
Suggestion: parasites'; parasite's
... organisms. The lecture claims that the parasites population should be small or they will...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld be small or they will kill the hosts  they feed on them. , I according to the ...
^^
Line 6, column 201, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...will kill the hosts  they feed on them. , I according to the fossils of angostide...
^
Line 6, column 203, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...ll kill the hosts  they feed on them. , I according to the fossils of angostide t...
^
Line 6, column 318, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t contradict the theory of parasites.yet , the reading refutes this point and sayi...
^^
Line 6, column 468, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ich reflect that agnosite were parasite also.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 216.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26388888889 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62432231003 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546296296296 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 67.5312684778 49.2860985944 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.75 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319011247263 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124110749416 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547770029804 0.0662205650399 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218778612541 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348505970084 0.0443174109184 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:

para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3

Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).

Don't need a conclusion paragraph.

Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.