tpo intergrated 27
Both the reading and the lecture try to discuss causes of the Little Ice Age. While the reading brings 3 causes and adds some information about them, the lecturer finds all these ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author argues that during the warm weather period before the Ice Age, a huge amount of glaciers melted and increased the level of cold fresh water in the Gulf Stream. These ocean currents may have disruptes the Gulf Stream, temporarily, as a result of this occurrence, the Little Ice Age took place in that time. In contrast, the lecturer plays up with the idea that the disruption caused cool climates only in the Northern Hemisphere Continents like America and Europe. The climate did not decline in places like sought Africa, so the disruption of ocean currents did not cause the Ice Age period, definitely.
Furthermore, the reading passage hold the view that a number of volcanic eruptions took place during the Little Ice Age, and they caused this period by producing dusts and emitting them into the atmosphere. This action decreased the global warming phenomenon, and the climate became cooler. Conversely, the speaker states that the clouds of dust were not strong and adequate enough to cause this period due to the fact that there were no submitted reports of the visual effects of these cloudy clouds of dust like a colorful sunset or a gray or brown snowfall.
Last but not least, the reading asserts that the decrease in human population led to the growth of the forest trees instead of agricultural crops, accordingly, these trees absorbed carbon dioxide and removed it from the atmosphere. This occurrence conducted the weather to become cooler because the greenhouse effect declined. In contrast, the speaker brings up some evidence that with the huge increase in the human population after that period, people grew crops in these fields fairly quickly and the trees were not there long enough to cause this Little Ice Age.
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'but', 'conversely', 'first', 'furthermore', 'may', 'so', 'while', 'in contrast', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.304109589041 0.261695866417 116% => OK
Verbs: 0.109589041096 0.158904122519 69% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0684931506849 0.0723426182421 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0493150684932 0.0435111971325 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.013698630137 0.0277247811725 49% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123287671233 0.128828473217 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0109589041096 0.0370669169778 30% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.39950614953 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0191780821918 0.0208969081088 92% => OK
Particles: 0.00547945205479 0.00154638098197 354% => OK
Determiners: 0.175342465753 0.128158765124 137% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0027397260274 0.0158828679856 17% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.0114777025283 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1994.0 1645.83664459 121% => OK
No of words: 335.0 271.125827815 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95223880597 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.04852973271 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.382089552239 0.374372842146 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.235820895522 0.287516216867 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.140298507463 0.187439937562 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.089552238806 0.113142543107 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39950614953 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537313432836 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 57.2776378902 53.8517498576 106% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.9166666667 21.7502111507 128% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1650507632 49.3711431718 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.166666667 132.220823453 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9166666667 21.7502111507 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.878197800319 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 51.4987562189 50.5018328374 102% => OK
Elegance: 2.53968253968 1.90840788429 133% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.704860014091 0.549887131256 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.135545687401 0.142949733639 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.052453857397 0.0787303798458 67% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.704903257177 0.631733273073 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.108447169626 0.139662658121 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.391312479801 0.266732575781 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112122470943 0.103435571967 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.491859977485 0.414875509568 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0801410423361 0.0530846634433 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.533206461964 0.40443939384 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966963965636 0.0528353158467 183% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.