TPO21 Integrated writing
Both the reading and the lecture discuss genetic modification. The reading implies that genetic modification will bring a number of benefits. However, the professor strongly disagrees with the reading passage. Accordingly, she presents three refutations.
First of all, the reading passage mentions that genetically modified trees are more likely to survive than their unmodified counterparts. Yet, the professor severely challenges the theory by arguing that it is not necessary for genetically modified trees are designed to resist the particular situation. Furthermore, she states that genetically modified trees are uniform. As a result, if they face other challenges, like climate change, they will all die. Therefore, the first theory is not convincing at all.
Secondly, the article suggests that genetically modified plants will bring economic benefit to farmers. Nevertheless, the scholar seriously contradicts the statement by maintaining that the companies selling genetically modified plants usually charge farmers more. Moreover, farmers cannot collect the plants they grow for free. Actually, they should pay to companies anytime. Hence, genetically modified plants cannot bring benefits to farmers.
Last but not least, the reading indicates that genetically modifies trees can prevent overexploitation of wild trees. Once again, the speaker opposes the statement by contending that genetically modifies trees would damage the local trees. In addition, since genetically modifies trees grow more aggressively than local ones, they would compete for the resource, such as sunlight, nutrition or water, with local trees. Thus, genetically modifies trees cannot prevent overexploitation of wild trees.
In conclusion, the professor argues against each theory in the reading. That is to say, she maintains that genetically modifies trees could not bring so many benefits.
- TPO 43 83
- People are easier to get educated today than in the past 80
- TPO21 Integrated writing 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what field they study in. 60
- People now are better at protecting the environment than people in the past. 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97426470588 5.08290768461 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94102711018 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547794117647 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5012341579 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.25 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.45 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.490100117287 0.272083759551 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162608044765 0.0996497079465 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1173422028 0.0662205650399 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265128357641 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113236595524 0.0443174109184 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.36 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.75 12.2367328918 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.