TPO_27_Integrated writing task
The reading passage ascribes the occurrence of the little ice age (an era of cold temperature lasting from 1350 to 1900CE) to ocean currents, volcanic clouds, and the decrease in human population. The lecturer, however, argues that recent evidence has proven all these reasons wrong.
First, the disruption of Gulf Stream could only have affected Europe and North America whereas the low temperatures of the regions in the Southern hemisphere, such as New Zealand and South Africa, could not have been resulted from that.
Second, volcanos possibly give off enough dust to cause the temperature to drop. Nevertheless, on the contrary to the reading, that has not been responsible for cooling either: Excessive amounts of dust in the atmosphere result in visual effects, such as brown-colored snow or a colorful sunset; nonetheless, as far as evidence goes, none of these effects have been reported.
Third, the decline in population abundance has not been responsible for the cold weather as well. The duration of the low population has lasted only for a short period and began cutting trees down again. Therefore, on the contrary to the reading, the decrease in human population has played no role in the cooling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-10 | Apolytos | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-30 | Allenwlh | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | Kamyar Mirzaei | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | suyun | 80 | view |
| 2021-02-25 | alibenvari | 80 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, third, well, whereas, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 22.412803532 22% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 198.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19191919192 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72989025157 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.4134437617 49.2860985944 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 7.06452816374 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290372292678 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102695751908 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641515448591 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149944659601 0.162205337803 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362795574147 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.