TPO31-integrate writing 2
The lecture is mainly discussing the reasons why Sinosauropteryx was a feathered dinosaur since the fossil included a pattern of fine lines, challenging the opposing views mentioned in the reading passage.
Firstly, in the reading passage, it is said that the fine lines may be the remains of skin fibers’ decomposition but not feathers. In contrast, the professor thinks that it cannot be interpreted as result of decomposition by skin fibers because we don’t see any such decomposition in the fossils of other animals buried at the same site. She indicates that fossils of many other animals buried at the site show evidence that their functional skin structures have been beautifully preserved in volcanic ash, the skin fibers can also be preserved as lines in fossil.
Secondly, the reading passage claims that the fine lines are more likely to be fossilized remains of frills than remains of feathers. However, the professor holds an opposite opinion that the fine lines in Sinosauropteryx's fossil cannot be frills because they contain certain protein. She claims that the Sinosauropteryx structures did contain certain protein that can be detected in these fine lines but the frills don't have it.
Finally, the reading believes that the lines do not represent feathers because they were located along the backbone and the tail of the animal. But the professor disagrees with it by pointing out that the lines can represent feathers because one of other birds also has feathers on its tail. She indicates that the colorful feathers on this bird are displayed to attract mates. Since Sinosauropteryx's fine lines are also colorful, they can represent feathers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-06 | Angelina2016 | 80 | view |
| 2017-08-06 | Angelina2016 | 76 | view |
| 2017-08-06 | Angelina2016 | 76 | view |
| 2017-08-06 | Angelina2016 | 68 | view |
| 2016-08-25 | civil2017 | 75 | view |
- TPO6-integrated writing 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often considered as a bad quality for a person. However, some people think that it is a good quality for a person. 80
- 31-integrated writing 5 3
- TPO30-W1 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 417, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...cted in these fine lines but the frills dont have it. Finally, the reading belie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26394052045 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88240524117 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505576208178 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8298896749 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.727272727 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448036578825 0.272083759551 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179201742064 0.0996497079465 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718362388167 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248453953301 0.162205337803 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563957961299 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.