TPO32
In the reading, the author claims that quackers were a strange sound which Russia sailor heard and bring three possibilities for the source of them. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
At first, the author argues that the noises belonged to male and female orca whales. Conversely, the lecturer provides the idea that whales live near the surface water whereas submarines move in deep water. Also, the presence of whales is completely detectable. Therefore, this noises unlikely related to whales’ orca.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that giant squids may produce quackers. On the contrary, the speaker underlines the fact that the noises were reported for two decades between 1960 and 1980 and after that these noises were stopped. If these noises were caused by squids, they would continue until now since these animal are living currently.
Finally, the reading asserts that foreign submarines generated these sounds. In the contrast, speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that submarines cannot be able to move and redirect fast, nevertheless the direction of noises changed quickly. Until now, there is technology which can move fast, silent and undetectable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 199.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34673366834 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49451811797 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.658291457286 0.540411800872 122% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1874941643 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5833333333 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270888085151 0.272083759551 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805556808972 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477085844382 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136181722913 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233817639183 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.