Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
All societies have consisted of numerous people with diverse range age and they can be divided into four classes: child, teenager, young and old. Generally, all of them should cooperate each other to achieve a desirable society; however, the influence of each class is dissimilar. There are a substantial number of people who are of the opinion that young people cannot affect crucial decision which has a dominant role in the future of society. I, personally repudiate this idea. This attitude will be exemplified in the ensuing paragraphs by focusing on three fundamental reasons.
One imperative reason coming to mind at first is that young people are the most energetic part of a society. Needless to say, a nation requires dynamic people who are able to do various jobs which promote the level of a country. Without young population hardly can a society prosper. Consider a country whose young population is fewer than the old one as an example. In the different industries, the lack of workmate and specialist will lead to this country be unable to strengthen and undependable to other nations. Therefore, the young population has a vital effect on a country.
The second interesting point which deserves some words here is that young population are significant applicants for study in universities and they gain up to date knowledge which can be useful for the future of society. Not only this information can help governments to make preferable decisions for current troubles but also it may lead to they invest and rely on young people to solve new problems. Some notable examples which juveniles do ample research on them are environmental pollution, global warming, and advanced medical approach. There is little room that solving this problem is a vital issue for societies.
Despite the reasoning presented in the preceding paragraphs provides sufficient confirmation for my stance on this issue, there is yet another reason that is of equal importance. Young people are more creative and risky than old people and tend to strive for finding novel ways for success. In order to illustrate, a noteworthy social study conducted at Tehran University can be pointed out. The researcher found out the 80% of entrepreneurial prefer to invest in young people ideas. This clearly substantiates the thought that how juveniles can be beneficial for the future of a nation.
In summary, taking all aforementioned ideas into consideration, one can safely assume that young people have effects on essential decisions for the future of their societies. The reasons for it are high energy, proficient data, and creative personality. I firmly recommend that governments should notably try to encourage young people to have more contribution in decision making.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mohammad9090 | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | nusybah | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | fafar | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | Seema Modak | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | Biz Biz | 80 | view |
- TPO 30 81
- TPO32 85
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 80
- TPO 3
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2320.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20179372197 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87651646276 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551569506726 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5345175276 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.869565217 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3913043478 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26086956522 5.45110844103 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227499703874 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669887041617 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666943173741 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143324130087 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562068128422 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.