It goes without saying that the prosperity and the failure of society heavily rely on decision-making practices. Moreover, young people are the majority proportion of every society. While some people are of the opinion that young people are the pillars of a community and their decisions can drive society to flourish, others assume that youngsters do not influence those significant decisions that shed light on the future of the society. Personally speaking, I agree with the previous statement; in what follows, I provide two crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
To begin with, young people are more cautious about the future of society since any particular decision and policy can devastate their future lives. With this in mind, in any social and political activities like protests, conferences, speeches, and so forth, the most major group of the audience are the youth. They take part in politic and economic gatherings to increase their political knowledge and share their ideas with the politicians. Also, scientists and technicians in universities are youth whose abilities cause social progressions. Most of the decision makings are based on these abilities. For example, a lot of graduate students, aged 22 to 27, are educated in politics, economics, social skills, and international communications. Since these professionals have just finished their researchers, they have ingenious ideas which can provide countries with great successes. As a result, they start to try different ways to convey their ideas through the events among which are conferences and symposiums to implement their plans.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that the youth are the most energetic group in societies. Each community consists of various age groups, such as juvenile, youth, middle-aged, and older people. Among the mentioned groups, only the youth are both physically and mentally sturdy. In this regard, they are the most influential members of a community. People younger than them are not mature enough to incorporate in governing issues, and the older ones have lost their energy. Therefore, the youth determine whether a decision is right or not. As a case in point, since they have ample power, they try weeks or months to convince other people to vote for their preferred candidate in an election. Last year, in my country, more than fifteen million of the youth, persuaded other older people to vote for Rohani. Consequently, he became president with more than twenty million votes which was ten million more than his rival’s votes.
As a matter of conclusion, one can settle that youth have considerable influences on communities. They are aware of the future and concerned about the works that will affect it, so they try to convey their ideas to governments. Also, they have a lot of energy, and they will allocate most of their power to build a better future.
- tpo 4 Endotherms are animals such as modern birds and mammals that keep their body temperatures constant. For instance, humans are endotherms and maintain an internal temperature of 37°C, no matter whether the environment is warm or cold. 80
- Integrated Writing Task: Chaco Canyon: How the buildings were used? Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories discussed on the reading passage. 90
- TPO 03 Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth century Dutch painters However there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 92
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 73
- TPO 31 less life satisfaction than the past 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2456.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27038626609 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80544910443 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538626609442 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 764.1 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8434511274 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184807747946 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519847681443 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586761780525 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125359316728 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793812378874 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 86.8835125448 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.