tpo34
The passage and the lecture both discuss a huge sea cow known as “Steller” who lived in a one of Siberia's island. The author of the article counts three reasons which can vindicate these animals' extinction. However, the professor respectively contradicts all passage’s assertions by using three specific points as support.
First, The passage claims that it is feasible that these mammals endangered because of overhunting by native folks in that area since they were good sources of food for those people. But the lecturer has the opposite opinion. He says stellers were bulky animals which made them hard objects to hunt, 9m long and 10-ton weight. He adds if we accept that Siberians hunted these animals, few of them were enough for their supplies and we can not count it as a reason for their extinction.
Secondly, the author of the passage claims we can consider ecosystems disturbances as a cause of extinction, maybe some changes near the area led the sea cows to become dead. By contrast, the professor refutes this hypothesis because he thinks if there were sever catastrophic events in those era that had an effect on marine life it should affect other creatures but there is no evidence that showed this phenomenon. He exemplifies some other marine animals like whales and highlight the fact that there were no reports from fishing ships about absence of whales in the sea.
Finally, the last reason that be asserted by the passage is the fact that those times some European fur marchants came to the area and they carried weaponds with them which made them reasonable fact to consider as stellers' hunters. the lecturer, nonetheless, accepts that these people came to that island those days but he emphasizes that in that time the number of sea cows had declined, happening 1000 years before the time these people arrived. Therefore, since the 2 events did not coincide with eachother we can not accept the presence of european traders were these animals' extinctions' reason.
- TPO 40 Integrated Writing Task 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The environmental issue is too complex to be handled by the individual 73
- tpo35 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If we can t say anything nice about someone then we should not say anything about this person 83
- Neighbors are the people who live near us In your opinion what type of neighbor is the best to have someone who is quiet someone who we are similar to someone who is supportive Use specific details and examples in your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...three reasons which can vindicate these animals extinction. However, the professor resp...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... if there were sever catastrophic events in those era that had an effect on marin...
^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this era' or 'those eras'?
Suggestion: this era; those eras
...here were sever catastrophic events in those era that had an effect on marine life it sh...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 232, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e fact to consider as stellers hunters. the lecturer, nonetheless, accepts that the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 22.412803532 201% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98502994012 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54803788077 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556886227545 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0153191219 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.076923077 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254496592843 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0887048518413 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761117946491 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154252119187 0.162205337803 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288150408178 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.