TPO40
The author of the lecture asserts that living on venus is impossible because of three reasons. The lecturer, however, finds this idea dubious and casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
First of all, the writer mentioned that atmospheric pressure of venuse surface is at least 90 times greater that earth. On the contrary, the lecturer underlines a solution for this problem. Indeed, pressure on the surface of venus is very higher than earth, but pressure on the atmosphere of venus is equal to earth. As a consequence, by constructing stations which are placed 50 kilometer away from surface, the problem of high pressure would be solved.
Furthermore, the author of reading states that venus does not have any reservoir of water. Therefore, the required water should be supply from the earth which is impractical. Conversely, the professor mentions that atmosphere of venus include carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid which could be use for produce of water. Thus, we do not have to transfer water from the earth, and it could be made from the venus' atmosphere.
Finally, the reading passage mentioned that most of the sunlight reflect due to the thick clouds in atmosphere of venus. Also, the energy for producing electricity could not be provide. On the contrast, the speaker dismisses this idea and mentions that these clouds are not very thick, so sunlight could pass from these cloulds. Moreover, stations could supply the energy for producing large amount of electricity by reflecting the sunlight in different direction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...nstructing stations which are placed 50 kilometer away from surface, the problem of high ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'supplied'?
Suggestion: supplied
...Therefore, the required water should be supply from the earth which is impractical. Co...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, at least, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14624505929 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63669842794 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541501976285 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.379165487 49.2860985944 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.0 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407789474453 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137558551825 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776613012929 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219966709034 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107904389652 0.0443174109184 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.