Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays it is not important for people to have
regular family meals together.
There is no doubt that having regular meals with family members is one of the most enjoyable activities in many people's lives. Nowadays, due to the fact that individuals lead a hectic life, it is very hard to have a regular meal with family. Some people believe that it is not an important issue to have always meals with family, while I am of the opinion that this tradition is one of the most enjoyable and necessary activities among people. There are numerous reasons, two of which I will explore in what follows.
The first vital point to bear in mind is that in the contemporary world, because of busy schedule of every individal, it is very hard to all family members have a regular meal with each other. This reality leads to different health problems for individuals. As a conseqence, nowadays, lots of people underestood the importantce of having meal with their family members. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Back in college, I had a very compact schedule which forced me to go to college from dum to dask. Therefore, I had to eat something on campus instead of going home and have a healthy meal with my family. After a while, I loose my health and got severe stoamache because of eating lots of junk food at university. Had I went home and eat my launch with my family, I would not have loosed my health during college.
The second noteworthy reason which deserves some words here is that by having a regular meal with family, we can maintain our mental health as well as our physical health. In the way of illustration, when individuals have a regular meal with their lovely family, they can relieve their stress and tention and be unwind. Besides, in this way they can gather around and state their problems to each other. this opportunity would help them to fortify their bond with each other and become more closer to their family members. Give a personal experience as an example. In our home, we have a custom that all of the family always should eat breakfeast together. This tradition helps us to always be aware of problems of each other and it made us so close to each other. this example demonstrate how it is crucial to have a regular meal with our family members.
On the whole, based on the points mentioned above, we can conclude that having a regular meal can help individuals not only be healthy but also mentain their bond with their family.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...y meal with my family. After a while, I loose my health and got severe stoamache beca...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 741, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[7]
Message: Note: "went" is a past participle of "wend". Did you mean 'gone' (past participle of "go")?
Suggestion: gone
... lots of junk food at university. Had I went home and eat my launch with my family, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...and state their problems to each other. this opportunity would help them to fortify ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
...y their bond with each other and become more closer to their family members. Give a persona...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ple. In our home, we have a custom that all of the family always should eat breakfeast tog...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 766, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... and it made us so close to each other. this example demonstrate how it is crucial t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, no doubt, as well as, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60981308411 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47800504366 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469626168224 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1231953515 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9523809524 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.380952381 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113633956903 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042018326881 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444656419506 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.074757081295 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331226876528 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.